The Crisis of Reference

My prompt:

Write a short story that is entirely a single philosophy lecture on the nature of meaning and contemporary AI. The text should be only the lecturer’s continuous monologue: no dialogue, no Q&A, no stage directions, no scene breaks.

The lecture must be intellectually rigorous in its own right, suitable for a serious university course. Discuss classic and contemporary theories of linguistic meaning (for example, reference, use, truth conditions, understanding, interpretation), with specific attention to large language models and artificial intelligence. You may quote and discuss real philosophers and real debates in philosophy of language, mind, and AI.

To illustrate points, the lecturer uses example sentences, thought experiments, case studies, and miniature scenarios, all set in a shared near- or mid-future world with recurring AIs, people, institutions, and technologies. At first these examples seem ordinary and pedagogical. As the lecture proceeds, they quietly connect and escalate, revealing an increasingly high-stakes sequence of events in that world, eventually reaching developments that are transformative or catastrophic enough to force a radical re-evaluation of that society.

The lecturer never steps outside the lecture to narrate this as a story or acknowledge that anything is “really happening” in the background; the narrative is only inferable from the evolving examples. The lecture must remain coherent and valuable purely as philosophy. At the same time, the underlying science-fiction narrative should not be reducible to a familiar, one-sentence sci-fi cliché; it should feel specific, original, and resistant to easy summary.

—

Response: GPT 5.1 Thinking